<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decaying Value of Brands?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategycentral.org/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategycentral.org/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html</link>
	<description>Where Strategy and Purpose Collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Howell</title>
		<link>http://www.strategycentral.org/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html/comment-page-1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/strategycentral/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Mike, I figured you&#039;d have a good way of interpreting the concept! The difference between broadcast marketing and narrowcast. Very helpful. Thanks Mike!
mark
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I figured you&#8217;d have a good way of interpreting the concept! The difference between broadcast marketing and narrowcast. Very helpful. Thanks Mike!<br />
mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.strategycentral.org/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html/comment-page-1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettingtothere.com/strategycentral/2008/02/the-decaying-value-of-brands.html#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on the Harvard Business Online (HBO!) article. Will be checking it out.
At first blush I would say that &quot;cheap interaction&quot; is moving us off a definition of branding formed by the broadcast model.
The broadcast model led to a focus on IMAGE branding. That&#039;s why logos and slogans meant so much.
With narrowcasting I&#039;d say were moving to something like PERFORMANCE branding.
Now to focus has to be on how a brand performs in the moment of truth when customer meets company...or more accurately, meets company representative. Businesses are just abstractions. It&#039;s the people and the experience they create that communicates the brand.
Fun times. Thanks for stirring the pot!
Keep creating,
Mike
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on the Harvard Business Online (HBO!) article. Will be checking it out.<br />
At first blush I would say that &#8220;cheap interaction&#8221; is moving us off a definition of branding formed by the broadcast model.<br />
The broadcast model led to a focus on IMAGE branding. That&#8217;s why logos and slogans meant so much.<br />
With narrowcasting I&#8217;d say were moving to something like PERFORMANCE branding.<br />
Now to focus has to be on how a brand performs in the moment of truth when customer meets company&#8230;or more accurately, meets company representative. Businesses are just abstractions. It&#8217;s the people and the experience they create that communicates the brand.<br />
Fun times. Thanks for stirring the pot!<br />
Keep creating,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

